🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents applauding your insights on growing your business? Do recruiters reaching out to explore opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals joined an organized professional network test this week following popular discussions suggested that switching their profile gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Similar to most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which posts are shown to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how content perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her audience decrease significantly.

The Method

• First, she changed her gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" language
• Finally, she recycled old posts with similar "assertive" style

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Previously, my content were more personal - concise and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after one week, stating "Each day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some testers experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in visibility and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to informal experiments where the same content by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."